R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis - meaning and definition. What is R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
Diclib.com
ChatGPT AI Dictionary
Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:

Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

  • how the word is used
  • frequency of use
  • it is used more often in oral or written speech
  • word translation options
  • usage examples (several phrases with translation)
  • etymology

What (who) is R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis - definition


R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis         
UK LEGAL CASE
R (on the application of L) (FC) (Appellant) v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent); R (on the application of L) (FC) (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent); R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; R (on the application of L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; R v Comr of Police of the Metropolis, ex p L
R (on the application of L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3, was a 2009 case heard by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.
Waters v Comr of Police for the Metropolis         
UK LEGAL CASE
Waters v Metropolitan Police; Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Waters v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
is a UK labour law case concerning victimisation for alleging rape, and whether the employee could claim this amounted to sex discrimination. It now falls under the Equality Act 2010 section 27.
R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis         
2000S BRITISH COURT CASE
R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Central Criminal Court; R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; R v Comr of Police of the Metropolis, ex p British Sky Broadcasting Ltd
was a 2014 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The court held that as inter partes proceedings created a lis between the parties (per Lewes), equal treatment (per Al Rawi) meant that ex parte evidence in general could not be adduced.

Wikipedia

R (L) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
R (on the application of L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3, was a 2009 case heard by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.